Publication

Does perceptual learning suffer from retrograde interference?

Michael Herzog, Carl Kristoffer Aberg
2010
Journal Articles

Abstract

In motor learning, training a task B can disrupt improvements of performance of a previously learned task A, indicating that learning needs consolidation. An influential study suggested that this is the case also for visual perceptual learning [1]. Using the same paradigm, we failed to reproduce these results. Further experiments with bisection stimuli also showed no retrograde disruption from task B on task A. Hence, for the tasks tested here, perceptual learning does not suffer from retrograde interference.

Official source

https://infoscience.epfl.ch/entities/publication/88fc2e65-aa95-4e47-82e6-eb5f84e3d36d

About this result

This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.

Graph Chat

Chat with Graph Search

Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.

DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.

Does perceptual learning suffer from retrograde interference?

Chat with Graph Search

Mice Use Prediction Errors to Adapt to Visuomotor Perturbations in Virtual Reality

Metacognition meets AI: Empowering reflective writing with large language models

How to support students to develop coaching and peer teaching skills