Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
As opposed to database transactional systems, transactional memory (TM) systems are constrained by real-time while treating their input workload. Nevertheless, there is no clear formalization of how a TM should react regarding to a specific input. While TM performance is often measured in terms of throughput, i.e., commit-rate (by time unit), we consider the commit-abort ratio of a TM for a given input, as the number of transactions this TM commits over the total number of input transactions. Building onto this, this paper defines the input acceptance of TMs depending on their commit-abort ratio on input classes. To this end, we exhibit several classes of workloads and identify bounds on the input acceptance of existing TM designs. Additionally, we propose a serializable STM that presents high input acceptance at the cost of a more complex algorithm than existing STMs. Finally, experimental validation compares the presented TM designs in terms of input acceptance with realistic workloads.