Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Porous-medium thermal-hydraulic modeling has become more popular in recent years for reactor analysis due to its flexibility and the ease of its implementation within multi-physics, PDE-oriented libraries like OpenFOAM and MOOSE.A porous-medium approach often provides similar results to that of heterogeneous (multi-region) models while only taking a fraction of the computational resources.However, nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems feature core heterogeneities and temperature gradients that challenge the use of a porous medium approach.This work presents the results of using the OpenFOAM-based porous medium solver GeN-Foam against results obtained using a heterogeneous solver on a fuel assembly in a reference NTP system.We employ two different porous-medium models with different levels of complexity, and we propose and test a GeN-Foam extension that allows modeling the axial and radial heat diffusion through a sub-scale structure.This heat transfer extension provides increased accuracy and the ability to simulate temperature redistribution in the solid structures.for instance after reactor shut-down.Results show that the inaccuracies associated with using a porous-medium approach are relatively small and generally acceptable in most cases, notably when considering the extra computational cost associated with heterogeneous simulations.Additionally, the heat diffusion extension to GeN-Foam shows great agreement with multi-region heat transfer solvers in OpenFOAM, verifying its implementation.