Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Impaired locomotion is a frequent and major source of disability in patients with neurological conditions. Different neuroimaging methods have been used to understand the brain substrates of locomotion in various neurological diseases (mainly in Parkinson's disease) during actual walking, and while resting (using mental imagery of gait, or brain-behavior correlation analyses). These studies, using structural (i.e., MRI) or functional (i.e., functional MRI or functional near infra-red spectroscopy) brain imaging, electrophysiology (i.e., EEG), non-invasive brain stimulation (i.e., transcranial magnetic stimulation, or transcranial direct current stimulation) or molecular imaging methods (i.e., PET, or SPECT) reveal extended brain networks involving both grey and white matters in key cortical (i.e., prefrontal cortex) and subcortical (basal ganglia and cerebellum) regions associated with locomotion. However, the specific roles of the various pathophysiological mechanisms encountered in each neurological condition on the phenotype of gait disorders still remains unclear. After reviewing the results of individual brain imaging techniques across the common neurological conditions, such as Parkinson's disease, dementia, stroke, or multiple sclerosis, we will discuss how the development of new imaging techniques and computational analyses that integrate multivariate correlations in "large enough datasets" might help to understand how individual pathophysiological mechanisms express clinically as an abnormal gait. Finally, we will explore how these new analytic methods could drive our rehabilitative strategies. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Friedhelm Christoph Hummel, Maximilian Jonas Wessel, Takuya Morishita, Traian Popa, Elena Beanato, Pierre Theopistos Vassiliadis, Fabienne Windel
Grégoire Courtine, Jocelyne Bloch, Quentin Barraud, Léonie Asboth, Robin Jonathan Demesmaeker, Claudia Kathe, Matthieu Pierre Gautier, Nicholas David James, Mark Andrew Anderson, Thomas Haynes Hutson, Katia Galan, Newton Cho, Jimmy James Ravier, Laetitia Danielle Philippine Baud, Achilleas Laskaratos, Kay Alexander Bartholdi, Camille Claire Varescon, Nicolas Hankov, Inssia Dewany, Frédéric Norbert Merlos, Nadine Intering, Viviana Aureli, Nadia Bérard, Michael Hodara, Kristina Sveistyte, Anna Leonhartsberger