Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Proximity exposure techniques in lithography are getting more and more popular because of the cost of ownership advantage of mask aligners compared to projection systems. In this paper a gap between simulation and the final result, the prints will be closed. We compare high resolution measurements of intensity field behind amplitude masks with proximity correction structures with simulations gain insight in limitation of proximity lithography. The final goal is to develop techniques that allow enhancing the resolution by using advanced optical correction structures. The correction structures are designed with Layout Lab (GenISys GmbH), prints are done and characterized and the results are compared with measured light intensity distributions. The light intensity distributions behind the mask are recorded using a High Resolution Interference Microscopy (HRIM). We concentrate on an example study of edge slope improvement and we explore possibilities of improved parameters like edge slope at different proximity distances. Simulations and measurements are compared and discussed.
Denis Gillet, Juan Carlos Farah, Jérémy Alain La Scala-Jayet