Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Two ruthenium sensitizers TT-230 and TT-232 based on cyclopenta[2,1-b:3,4-b']dithiophene (CDT) were tested in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) using,a tri-iodide/iodide redox couple, and their performances compared to the benchmark Z907. Both dyes of general formula Ru(LL')(NCS)(2) feature the same 4.4'-dicarboxylic acid 2,2'-bipyridine moiety acting as the anchoring group (L) to attach the dye on the TiO2 surface, and two CDT subunits as ancillary groups (L' either directly-linked (11-230) or vinylene-linked (TT-232) to the bipyridine moiety. In comparison with TT-230, the it-extended conjugation in TT-232 caused significant redshift and broadening of the absorption bands. However, despite better light-harvesting properties, the DSSC device sensitized with TT-232 strikingly underperformed compared to TT-230 under same conditions (PCE = 3.2% and 6.1%, respectively). The use of co-adsorbent (CHENO) or surfactants did not help to improve the photovoltaic properties of TT-230, and resulted in a degradation of the overall efficiency of the cell. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Christophe Ballif, Aïcha Hessler-Wyser, Antonin Faes, Umang Bhupatrai Desai, Kléber Nicolet-dit-Félix
Michael Graetzel, Shaik Mohammed Zakeeruddin, Felix Thomas Eickemeyer