Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
This paper presents the semi-passive replication technique -- a variant of passive replication -- that can be implemented in the asynchronous system model without requiring a membership service to agree on a primary. Passive replication is a popular replication technique since it can tolerate non-deterministic servers (e.g., multi-threaded servers) and uses little processing power when compared to other replication techniques. However, passive replication suffers from a high reconfiguration cost in case of the failure of the primary. The semi-passive replication technique presented in the paper benefits from the same advantages as passive replication. However, since it does not require a group membership service, semi-passive replication has a considerably lower cost in case of failure. As explained in the paper, this technique can benefit from an aggressive time-out value significantly lower than what a group membership allows. As a result, the reaction to crashes is greatly improved. The semi-passive replication algorithm uses failure detectors. The algorithm given in the paper is analysed in the failure free case and in the case of one server crash. The response time (for the client) of these two scenarios is analysed through simulation.