Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
When using random utility models for a route choice problem, choice set generation and correlation among alternatives are two issues that make the modeling complex. In this paper we discuss different models capturing path overlap. First, we analyze several formulations of the Path Size Logit model proposed in the literature and show that the original formulation should be used. Second, we propose a modeling approach where the path overlap is captured with a subnetwork. A subnetwork is a simplification of the road network only containing easy identifiable and behaviorally relevant roads. In practice, the subnetwork can easily be defined based on the route network hierarchy. We propose a model where the subnetwork is used for defining the correlation structure of the choice model. The motivation is to explicitly capture the most important correlation without considerably increasing the model complexity. We present estimation results of a factor analytic specification of a mixture of Multinomial Logit model, where the correlation among paths is captured both by a Path Size attribute and error components. The estimation is based on a GPS dataset collected in the Swedish city of Borlänge. The results show a significant increase in model fit for the Error Component model compared to a Path Size Logit model. Moreover, the correlation parameters are significant.