Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The early visual system is organized retinotopically. However, motion perception occurs in non-retinotopic coordinates. Even though many perceptual studies revealed the central role of non-retinotopic processes, little is known about their neural correlates and mechanisms. Tadin and colleagues (2003) found that increasing the spatial size of a high-contrast drifting-Gabor deteriorates motion-direction discrimination whereas the opposite occurs with a low-contrast stimulus. This is proposed to reflect a perceptual correlate of an adaptive center-surround antagonism, whereby at low-contrast excitatory center dominates whereas at high-contrast suppressive-surround mechanisms become more effective. We tested the hypothesis that the non-retinotopic system also processes motion information by means of an adaptive center-surround mechanism. We used the Ternus-Pikler display, a paradigm that pits against each other retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations. The Ternus-Pikler display contained three Gabor-patches. Depending on ISI (133ms vs. 0ms), either group- or element-motion is perceived, i.e., either all Gabors moved back and forth in tandem or the utmost Gabors jumped alternating left-right. One of the Gabors in the display contained a fixed phase-shift that created the perception of coherent drift in either retinotopic or non-retinotopic coordinates. Observers were instructed to attend to one of the Gabors in the display and report its drift direction. We measured phase-shift thresholds for motion-direction discrimination while varying the size and contrast of the stimulus. Our results show a statistically significant interaction of size and contrast in both retinotopic and non-retinotopic tasks. We observed increases in thresholds as a function of size at high-contrast values and threshold decreases as a function of size at weak contrast values, thereby generalizing Tadin et al.’s results to non-retinotopic processing. Our results suggest that the non-retinotopic process may also be mediated by an adaptive center-surround mechanism where at low-contrast spatial summation prevails and then shifts to surround suppression as the input contrast increases.