Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
This paper clarifies the terminologies used to describe the size effect on fatigue behaviour of welded joints. It summarizes the existing research on size effect in the perspective of newly defined terminologies. It identifies knowledge gaps in designing tubular joints using the hot spot stress method, i.e. thin-walled tubular joints with wall thickness less than 4 mm and thick-walled tubular joints with wall thickness larger than 50 mm or diameter to thickness ratio less than 24. It is the thin-walled tubular joints that are addressed in this paper. It is found out that thin-walled tube-to-plate T-joints do not follow the conventional trend: the thinner the section is, the higher the fatigue life. It is also found out that simple extrapolation of existing fatigue design curves may result in unsafe design of thin-walled tube-to-tube T-joints. The effect of chord stiffness on the fatigue behaviour of thin-walled tubular T-joints is also discussed. KEYWORDS: Size effect, Thickness effect; welded joints; plate; tube; weld defects; fatigue.
Katrin Beyer, Savvas Saloustros
Thomas Keller, Lulu Liu, Abdolvahid Movahedirad