Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The two techniques, vibratory monitoring and pit counting, show promising results for the prediction of prototype cavitation erosion from model tests of Francis turbines. These cavitation detection methods are compared in two set-ups at different power levels, a laboratory high velocity cavitation jet and a full scale 270 MW Francis turbine. Excellent quantitative correlations are obtained in the jet tests between erosion rate, volume pitting rate measured on polished metal surfaces of different hardness with a laser profilometer and the mean square value of forces on the eroded specimen inferred from measurements with a high frequency accelerometer on the specimen holder. On the large prototype good coherent results are also obtained but the vibratory information requires much finer analysis. In particular the varying erosive cavitation intensity with power output level is well detected by both methods. The two cavitation detection techniques exhibit great dynamic range and can prove very useful in characterizing the erosive aggressiveness of cavitating flow both in large machines and in reduced scale models.
François Avellan, Mohamed Farhat
François Avellan, Mohamed Farhat