Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
We present the results of the first Dalitz plot analysis of the decay D-0 -> K-pi(+)eta. The analysis is performed on a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 953 fb(-1) collected by the Belle detector at the asymmetric-energy e(+)e(-) KEKB collider. The Dalitz plot is well described by a combination of the six resonant decay channels (K) over bar*(892)(0)eta, K(-)a(0)(980)(+), K(-)a(2)(1320)+, K(-)a(2)(1410)(0)eta, K*(1680)(-)pi(+) and K-2*(1980)(-)pi(+), together with K pi and eta K eta S-wave components. The decays K* (1680)(-)-> K-eta and K-2* (1980)--> K-eta are observed for the first time. We measure ratio of the branching fractions, B(D-0 -> K-pi(+)eta)/B(D-0 -> K-pi(+)) = 0.500 +/- 0.002(stat) +/- 0.020(syst) +/- 0.003(B-PDG). Using the Dalitz fit result, the ratio B(K*(1680)-> K eta)/B(K*(1680)-> K pi) is measured to be 0.11 +/- 0.002(stat)(-0.04)(+0.06)(syst) +/- 0.04(B-PDG); this is much lower than the theoretical expectations (approximate to 1) made under the assumption that K*(1680) is a pure 1(3)D(1) state. The product branching fraction B(D-0 -> [K-2*(1980)- -> K-eta]pi(+)) = (2.2-1.9+1.7) x 10(-4) is determined. In addition, the pi eta' contribution to the a(0)(980)(+/-) resonance shape is confirmed with 10.1 sigma statistical significance using the three-channel Flatte model. We also measure B(D-0 -> (K) over bar*(892)(0)eta) = (1.41(-0.12)(+0.13))%. This is consistant with, and more precise than, the current world average (1.02 +/- 0.30)%, deviates with a significance of more than 3 sigma from the theoretical predictions of (0.51-0.92)%.
Jan Steggemann, Konstantin Androsov, Anna Mascellani, Joanna Malgorzata Wanczyk