Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Ruthenium-based C106 and organic D131 sensitizers have been judicially chosen for co-sensitization due to their complementary absorption properties and different molecular sizes. Co-sensitization yields a higher light-harvesting efficiency as well as better dye coverage to passivate the surface of TiO2. The co-sensitized devices C106 + D131 showed significant enhancement in the performance (eta = 11.1%), which is a marked improvement over baseline devices sensitized with either D131 (eta = 5.6%) or C106 (eta = 9.5%). The improved performance of the co-sensitized cell is attributed to the combined enhancement in the short circuit current, open circuit voltage, and the fill-factor of the solar cells. J(sc) is improved because of the complementary absorption spectra and favorable energy level alignments of both dyes; whereas, V-oc is improved because of the better surface coverage helping to reduce the recombination and increase the electron life time. The origins of these enhancements have been systematically studied through dye desorption, absorption spectroscopy, and intensity modulated photovoltage spectroscopy investigations.
Michael Graetzel, Shaik Mohammed Zakeeruddin, Felix Thomas Eickemeyer
Christophe Ballif, Aïcha Hessler-Wyser, Quentin Thomas Jeangros, Mostafa Rabie Shlaly Bahr Othman
Michael Graetzel, Jacques-Edouard Moser, Etienne Christophe Socie, George Cameron Fish, Aaron Tomas Terpstra