Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Phase imaging has been demonstrated to offer a good contrast between and within brain tissues at 7T[1] with iron and myelin concentration being amongst the main modulators of the observed contrast due to their para- and dia-magnetic properties.Phase imaging suffers from a non-local contrast variation which can be overcome by calculating the underlying magnetic susceptibility maps[2].As this problem is ill-posed, many regularized methods have been proposed over the past years[2,3,4].The regularized single-orientation (RSO)[2] based on the l2 regularisation and the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI)[3] method based on the l1 total variation incorporate prior knowledge of the expected edges taken from the magnitude image.In this abstract a systematic evaluation is performed of a l2 RSO method[2,5] and a l1 total variation method (TV)[3] using numerical data and different morphology priors.
Volkan Cevher, Grigorios Chrysos, Fanghui Liu, Elias Abad Rocamora
Ileana Ozana Jelescu, Yujian Diao