Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
This paper establishes tight bounds on the \emph{best-case} time-complexity of distributed atomic read/write storage implementations that tolerate \emph{worst-case} conditions. We study asynchronous robust implementations where a writer and a set of reader processes (clients) access an atomic storage implemented over a set of server processes of which can fail: of these can be malicious and the rest can crash. We define a lucky operation (read or write) as one that runs synchronously and without contention. It is often argued in practice that lucky operations are the most frequent. We determine the exact conditions under which a {\em lucky} operation can be {\em fast}, namely expedited in one-communication round-trip with no data authentication. We show that every \emph{lucky} write (resp., read) can be \emph{fast} despite (resp., ) actual failures, if and only if .
Paolo Ienne, Canberk Sönmez, Mohamed Mahfouz Ahmed Kotb Shahawy, Cemalettin Cem Belentepe
Bryan Alexander Ford, Simone Maria Stefano Colombo