Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Second-order optimization methods offer superior convergence rates but are often bottlenecked by the wall-clock cost of Hessian computation and factorization. In the moderate-dimensional regime where the full Hessian fits in memory, factorization typically dominates gradient evaluation , creating a synchronization barrier that negates the per-iteration progress of classical second-order methods. We propose the \emph{Split-Client} framework, which decouples optimization into parallel gradient and curvature processes. Unlike Lazy Hessian approaches, whose arithmetic-complexity analysis does not charge factorization time and whose optimal reuse frequency requires tuning, our method is fully \textbf{delay-adaptive}: its wall-clock complexity scales with the \emph{average} delay , and it matches the optimally-tuned Lazy rate of without any tuning. For persistent curvature error, we provide a noise-adaptive schedule with rate (on ), recovering the rate that uniform-error analyses such as Kamzolov et al (2023) achieve via inflated regularization. Under a verifiable subspace-alignment condition, an additional \emph{structured} analysis based on the secant condition of L-BFGS gives a faster rate, with a hybrid theorem interpolating smoothly between the two regimes. We extend the framework to Subsampled Cubic Newton with adaptive batch sizes and an aggregate sampling budget linear in . Experiments on two non-convex problems show wall-clock speedups of up to over Vanilla and over Lazy in the strongly factorization-dominated regime.