Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Three different methods of cavitation erosion measurement are compared and correlated with weight loss rates in two cavitation set-ups: a high-pressure cavitation jet producing a high repetition rate of a wide range of impact intensities and a single vortex machine producing a low repetition rate of large collapses. The electrochemical cavitation activated current measurements on pure titanium sensors are calibrated on the jet and used to evaluate erosion rates on the vortex. The cavitation pit counting technique on polished surfaces of 7 different hardness metals is compared with high frequency accelerometer data in both set-ups. Pit dimensions indicate that the impact intensity of the vortex collapses is comparable to that of the lowest intensity of jet cavitation. Good correlations are found between erosion rate, volume-pitting rate and high frequency inferred forces over more than six orders of magnitude.