Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
In the last few years, the critical temperature (Tc) of several ITER cable-in-conduit conductors (CICC) was determined by magnetization measurements at zero current. The distribution of the critical temperatures (Tc), caused by variation of strain in the Nb3Sn strands, was found to vary with the number of load cycles. A comparison with mechanical modelling requires the strain distribution, while the Tc distribution is sufficient to determine the CICC performance. The current sharing temperature (Tcs) is calculated supposing that the measured distribution of Tc is representative of its variation along a single strand and that the current is uniformly distributed among the strands. The Tcs values, found for background and peak magnetic field, are compared with the results of the DC test in the SULTAN facility. The presented estimation techniques lead to an overestimation of Tcs. The differences of the estimated and measured Tcs values are discussed including the effect of different current-voltage characteristics of single strands and CIC conductors.