Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The systematic use of high-fidelity high-resolution codes which allow the prediction of safety parameters on a local scale, can result in more efficient use of the nuclear fuel and of the nuclear reactor.The Laboratory of Reactor Physics and Thermal-Hydraulics of PSI is developing a high-resolution multi-physics tool with the neutronic code nTRACER and the sub-channel code COBRA-TF (CTF) for PWR full core analysis.This work presents the verification of nTRACER with Serpent2 reference solutions within the framework of the OECD/NEA TVA Watts Bar 1 benchmark.The nTRACER results indicate good agreement with the Serpent2 predictions for the initial criticality case of TVA WB1.The maximum axially averaged pin power difference is 1.08%.nTRACER is also verified with the benchmark Exercise 1-Hot Zero Power start-up tests, never exceeding 100 pcm of difference with Serpent2.In addition, the coupled code system nTRACER/CTF is compared with the MC21/CTF reference solution for the Hot Full Power Exercise 2 of the benchmark.nTRACER/CTF presents good agreement in terms of assembly and eigenvalue.The maximum power difference is 1.54%.The assembly outlet temperature is underestimated power by a maximum of 2.66 °C.This can be attributed to different modeling options and material properties used by nTRACER/CTF and the reference solution.