Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The energy efficiency of digital architectures is tightly linked to the voltage level (Vdd) at which they operate. Aggressive voltage scaling is therefore mandatory when ultra-low power processing is required. Nonetheless, the lowest admissible Vdd is often bounded by reliability concerns, especially since static and dynamic non-idealities are exacerbated in the near-threshold region, imposing costly guard-bands to guarantee correctness under worst-case conditions. A striking alternative, explored in this paper, waives the requirement for unconditional correctness, undergoing more relaxed constraints. First, after a run-time failure, processing correctly resumes at a later point in time. Second, failures induce a limited Quality-of-Service (QoS) degradation. We focus our investigation on the practical scenario of embedded bio-signal analysis, a domain in which energy efficiency is key, while applications are inherently error-tolerant to a certain degree. Targeting a domain-specific multi-core platform, we present a study of the impact of inexactness on application-visible errors. Then, we introduce a novel methodology to manage them, which requires minimal hardware resources and a negligible energy overhead. Experimental evidence show that, by tolerating 900 errors/hour, the resulting inexact platform can achieve an efficiency increase of up to 24%, with a QoS degradation of less than 3%.