Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
This article explores the efficiency of motion-compensated three-dimensional transform coding, a compression scheme that employs a motion-compensated transform for a group of pictures. We investigate this coding scheme experimentally and theoretically. The practical coding scheme employs in temporal direction a wavelet decomposition with motion-compensated lifting steps. Further, we compare the experimental results to that of a predictive video codec with single-hypothesis motion compensation and comparable computational complexity. The experiments show that the 5/3 wavelet kernel outperforms both the Haar kernel and, in many cases, the reference scheme utilizing single-hypothesis motion-compensated predictive coding. The theoretical investigation models this motion-compensated subband coding scheme for a group of K pictures with a signal model for K motion-compensated pictures that are decorrelated by a linear transform. We utilize the Karhunen-Loeve Transform to obtain theoretical performance bounds at high bit-rates and compare to both optimum intra-frame coding of individual motion-compensated pictures and single-hypothesis motion-compensated predictive coding. The investigation shows that motion-compensated three-dimensional transform coding can outperform predictive coding with single-hypothesis motion compensation by up to 0.5 bits/sample.