Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
In this article I am going to analyze crowd dynamics in co-creation settings (Cordella, Paletti, & Maha, 2018; Ramaswamy & Ozcan, 2018; Viscusi & Tucci, 2018). Furthermore, I am going to investigate the connection between these dynamics and the values informing or rather forming the outputs of co-creation initiatives, with a specific focus on technology innovation (Shilton, 2013; Snyder, Shilton, & Anderson, 2016; Stirling, 2007). On the one hand, the research aims to provide an understanding of how crowd dynamics eventually shape collective co-creation activities, either enabling or bounding their capacity of scaling; on the other hand, the different dimensions and perspectives on values are questioned in their difference through the shapes that co-creation practices may assume once moving from, e.g., value intensive setting of local groups and communities to a population assuming the dimension of anonymous crowd in co-creation practices characterized by seriality (Sartre, 1960; Viscusi & Tucci, 2018; Young, 1994). The theoretical arguments will be developed empirically through the analysis of the case study of a Robotics Innovation Facility (RIF) based in Italy, one of the initiatives funded by the European project ECHORD++ to provide access to businesses as well as a general audience to high-tech robotic equipment and expertise, thus eventually promoting and enabling co-creation in robotics.
Auke Ijspeert, Francesco Mondada