Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Laboratory soil column experiments, often involving steady flow, have a long and enduring history in hydrology and soil science. Typically, analyses of laboratory column data assume that the flow is both steady and uniform within the soil column. However, the establishment of uniform, steady flow requires careful construction of the experimental apparatus. Recently, Bromly et al. (2007, Eur J Soil Sci 5, 293-301) carried out a meta-analysis of 216 solute transport experiments, considering reported dispersivities and their relation to flow velocity, clay and silt content, bulk density, and column diameter and length. They found dispersivity increased with column diameter. Consistent with this finding is the hypothesis that, in experiments, larger column diameters lead to increased disturbance in the flow. This hypothesis was investigated by solving the flow equation in cylindrical coordinates, and examining the dissipation length scale associated with both smooth and abrupt disturbances at the column entrance and/or exit planes. For a homogeneous soil, the analysis reveals the remarkably simple result that, independent of the disturbance itself, the dissipation length of the relative disturbance magnitude equals the column radius, i.e., the disturbances die out at a longitudinal distance from the boundary of one column radius. This result provides the basis for designing baffle zones in soil column experiments.