Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The solid-state structure of the cationic MeO-Biphep Rh(I) compd. [Rh((S)-MeO-Biphep)(P{OMe}3)2]BF4 (3) was detd. by x-ray diffraction. The four P-donors deviate markedly from square-planar geometry, with the phosphite ligands P2 and P2' ca. +-0.61(7) .ANG. from the P1-Rh-P1' plane. This distortion resembles that found for PdBr(p-NCC6H4)((S)-MeO-Biphep) (1). D. functional calcns. on systematically varied models of 1 reveal three major components to be responsible for the obsd. distortion from square-planar geometry: (i) attractive arom. ring p-p interactions, (ii) electronic stabilization of coplanar arom. rings in pseudo-trans positions, and (iii) P-Ph and MeO-Biphep-Ph intraligand repulsive steric interactions. Addnl. DFT studies on the p-tolyl-Binap analog of 1, PdBr(p-NCC6H4)((R)-p-Tol-Binap) (2), explain the source of the extremely long Pd-P2 bond distance, 2.437(1) .ANG., in 2. Despite the structural similarity between 1 and 2, the calcns. rationalize the observation of a pronounced distortion from a square-planar geometry in the former that is essentially absent in the latter. [on SciFinder (R)]