Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Within the frame of the revision of the Eurocode 2 for concrete structures, the section devoted to strut-and-tie design has been up-dated to enhance its applicability, its consistency with other sections and its ease-of-use. As a result, a number of changes have been introduced. Namely, the use of stress fields and their combination with classical strut-and-tie models has been incorporated. The changes in this section can be seen as an effort to provide a more comprehensive and general tool for designers, that can be transpar-ently applied to any structural member with sufficient reinforcement for crack control. In this paper, the consistency between the strut-and-tie and the stress field methods is clarified as well as the fundamentals of the revision performed in Eurocode 2. The paper also elaborates how the code can be used for advanced analyses, considering in an explicit manner the compatibility of deformations to obtain refined estimates of the structural resistance..
David Michael Volpe Ruggiero, Sjonnie Boonstra