Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The brain's temporal organisation arises from the dynamic interplay between neural rhythms that supports cognition across timescales from milliseconds to minutes. Such a complex and flexible organisation poses fundamental representational challenges. Time-delay embedding (TDE) has emerged as a promising computational tool in the study of neural signals, yet it is employed in two fundamentally different ways: as a spectral estimator, via the singular-spectrum analysis framework and the TDE hidden Markov model (TDE-HMM), and as a phase-space reconstruction tool for attractor geometry, where it enables recurrence-based analyses. The consequences of this epistemological divide - what each TDE philosophy reveals about cognitive dynamics, and at what interpretive cost - remain poorly characterised. This thesis addresses that gap through three investigations, each conducted on magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings of human subjects performing an N-back working-memory task. In the first study, we demonstrate that TDE-HMM recovers cognitively meaningful temporal structure across multiple timescales simultaneously, tracking both fast trial-level neural events and slow block-level contextual influences across three independent MEG cohorts â without prior specification of the timescales of interest. In the second study, we show that TDE-HMM realisations of statistically comparable free energy can produce non-equivalent posterior dynamics, such that recovered brain maps map differently to task conditions across models, revealing a potential gap between statistical model quality and scientific interpretability that motivates cross-methodological triangulation as a validity criterion. In the third study, we apply recurrence quantification analysis to the phase-space reconstruction of MEG signals and demonstrate that structured recurrent episodes become less frequent with increasing working-memory load while preserving their internal character - a pattern consistent with event-related desynchronisation and inconsistent with a gain change - providing interpretative specificity that spectral and entropy-based measures alone cannot supply. Taken together, these findings reveal the fundamental tradeoff between the two TDE philosophies: the spectral use of TDE can uncover multiscale cognitive dynamics with fine temporal precision, but at the apparent cost of initialisation instability; the geometric, phase-space reconstruction use disambiguates signal reorganisations that spectral approaches cannot, at the cost of temporal resolution. The analytical choice made on top of a time-delay embedding is not merely technical: it determines how the TDE parameters should be selected and what aspects of cognitive dynamics are visible.