Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
To evaluate whether an activity monitor based on body acceleration measurement can accurately assess the energy cost of the human locomotion, 12 subjects walked a combination of three different speeds (preferred speed+/-1 km/h) and seven slopes (-15 to + 15% by steps of 5%) on a treadmill. Body accelerations were recorded using a triaxial accelerometer attached to the low back. The mean of the integral of the vector magnitude (norm) of the accelerations (mIAN) was calculated. (V) over dot O-2 was measured using continuous indirect calorimetry. When the results were separately analysed for each incline, mIAN was correlated to V. O2 (average r = 0.87, p < 0.001, n = 36). (V) over dot O-2 was not significantly correlated to mIAN when data were globally analysed (n = 252). Large relative errors occurred when predicted V. O2 (estimated from data of level walking) was compared with measured (V) over dot O-2 for different inclines (- 53% at +15% incline, to + 55% at - 15% incline). It is concluded that without an external measurement of the slope, the standard method of analysis of body accelerations cannot accurately predict the energy cost of uphill or downhill walking.
Simon Nessim Henein, Charles Baur