Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The energy savings potential of selected low-cost measures related to the simultaneous control of blinds, electric lighting, heating, cooling and ventilation in a single building zone (Integrated Room Automation) was investigated. The analysis was based on a factorial study comprising several thousands, whole-year hourly time step simulations. The largest energy savings potential was found for the use of CO2-controlled ventilation as opposed to non-air quality controlled ventilation (average savings of 13%–28%, depending on the building zone characteristics and the choice of technical building system), followed by a widening of the thermal comfort range by ~1.5 oC (6%–16%), and the allowance for night/weekend room temperature set-back (0%–18%). Substantial energy savings potentials were also detected for advanced control: readily realizable energy savings thanks to improved non-predictive control amounted to 1%–15%, and theoretical savings potentials for predictive control to 16%–41%. The found, large case-to-case variability surrounding these average numbers un- derlines the importance of simulation-based assessments on a per case basis.
Marilyne Andersen, Steffen Lutz Hartmeyer
François Maréchal, Daniel Alexander Florez Orrego, Meire Ellen Gorete Ribeiro Domingos