Lecture

Actor Failure Handling

Graph Chat

Chat with Graph Search

Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.

DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.

Description

This lecture covers failure handling in asynchronous systems using the Actor Model, where failures are reified as messages and sent to known addresses for handling by team leaders. It also discusses supervision, resilience, supervisor strategies, actor identity for recovery, actor lifecycle hooks, and lifecycle spanning restarts.

Official source

Related concepts (32)

Actor model

The actor model in computer science is a mathematical model of concurrent computation that treats an actor as the basic building block of concurrent computation. In response to a message it receives, an actor can: make local decisions, create more actors, send more messages, and determine how to respond to the next message received. Actors may modify their own private state, but can only affect each other indirectly through messaging (removing the need for lock-based synchronization). The actor model originated in 1973.

Actor model theory

In theoretical computer science, Actor model theory concerns theoretical issues for the Actor model. Actors are the primitives that form the basis of the Actor model of concurrent digital computation. In response to a message that it receives, an Actor can make local decisions, create more Actors, send more messages, and designate how to respond to the next message received. Actor model theory incorporates theories of the events and structures of Actor computations, their proof theory, and denotational models.

Message passing

In computer science, message passing is a technique for invoking behavior (i.e., running a program) on a computer. The invoking program sends a message to a process (which may be an actor or object) and relies on that process and its supporting infrastructure to then select and run some appropriate code. Message passing differs from conventional programming where a process, subroutine, or function is directly invoked by name. Message passing is key to some models of concurrency and object-oriented programming.

Actor model and process calculi

In computer science, the Actor model and process calculi are two closely related approaches to the modelling of concurrent digital computation. See Actor model and process calculi history. There are many similarities between the two approaches, but also several differences (some philosophical, some technical): There is only one Actor model (although it has numerous formal systems for design, analysis, verification, modeling, etc.

Indeterminacy in concurrent computation

Indeterminacy in concurrent computation is concerned with the effects of indeterminacy in concurrent computation. Computation is an area in which indeterminacy is becoming increasingly important because of the massive increase in concurrency due to networking and the advent of many-core computer architectures. These computer systems make use of arbiters which gives rise to indeterminacy. Patrick Hayes [1973] argued that the "usual sharp distinction that is made between the processes of computation and deduction, is misleading".

Related lectures (21)

Actors are Distributed Part 1

The Actor Model: Principles of Reactive Programming

Covers the Actor Model, emphasizing asynchronous message passing and changing an Actor's behavior.

The Actor Model: Principles of Reactive Programming

Introduces the Actor Model, explaining actors' identity, behavior, and asynchronous message passing.

Lifecycle Monitoring and The Error Kernel

Covers lifecycle monitoring, error handling, and fault tolerance in reactive programming.

Structured Classifications: Decision Trees and Boosting