Lecture

Instability: Euler to Streamfunction Equation

Graph Chat

Chat with Graph Search

Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.

DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.

In course

ME-466: Instability

This course focuses on the physical mechanisms at the origin of the transition of a flow from laminar to turbulent using the hydrodynamic instability theory. ...

Description

This lecture covers the transition from Euler equations to streamfunction equation, discussing kinematic boundary conditions, perturbed kinematic boundary conditions, normal mode expansion, and the dispersion relation. It also explores the influence of stratification, surface tension, and their joint effect on flow stability, as well as Kelvin-Helmholtz instability and toroidal vortices. The presentation emphasizes the mathematical derivations and physical interpretations of the concepts presented.

Instructor

François Gallaire

google scholar https://scholar.google.ch/citations?hl=fr&user=T3OooAcAAAAJ François Gallaire earned his engineering degree from Ecole Polytechnique in 1998 and a master's in Liquids Physics from Université Pierre et Marie Curie in 1999. He completed his PhD in 2002 at LadHyX on swirling flow instabilities and vortex breakdown. After six years at the Mathematics department of Université de Nice, he joined EPFL in 2009, founding the Fluid Mechanics and Instabilities Lab (LFMI). He became an associate professo

Official source

Related concepts (32)

Copenhagen interpretation

The Copenhagen interpretation is a collection of views about the meaning of quantum mechanics, stemming from the work of Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and others. The term "Copenhagen interpretation" was apparently coined by Heisenberg during the 1950s to refer to ideas developed in the 1925–1927 period, glossing over his disagreements with Bohr. Consequently, there is no definitive historical statement of what the interpretation entails.

Interpretations of quantum mechanics

An interpretation of quantum mechanics is an attempt to explain how the mathematical theory of quantum mechanics might correspond to experienced reality. Although quantum mechanics has held up to rigorous and extremely precise tests in an extraordinarily broad range of experiments, there exist a number of contending schools of thought over their interpretation. These views on interpretation differ on such fundamental questions as whether quantum mechanics is deterministic or stochastic, local or non-local, which elements of quantum mechanics can be considered real, and what the nature of measurement is, among other matters.

Many-minds interpretation

The many-minds interpretation of quantum mechanics extends the many-worlds interpretation by proposing that the distinction between worlds should be made at the level of the mind of an individual observer. The concept was first introduced in 1970 by H. Dieter Zeh as a variant of the Hugh Everett interpretation in connection with quantum decoherence, and later (in 1981) explicitly called a many or multi-consciousness interpretation. The name many-minds interpretation was first used by David Albert and Barry Loewer in 1988.

Many-worlds interpretation

The many-worlds interpretation (MWI) is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts that the universal wavefunction is objectively real, and that there is no wave function collapse. This implies that all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are physically realized in some "world" or universe. In contrast to some other interpretations, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, the evolution of reality as a whole in MWI is rigidly deterministic and local.

Ensemble interpretation

The ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics considers the quantum state description to apply only to an ensemble of similarly prepared systems, rather than supposing that it exhaustively represents an individual physical system. The advocates of the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics claim that it is minimalist, making the fewest physical assumptions about the meaning of the standard mathematical formalism. It proposes to take to the fullest extent the statistical interpretation of Max Born, for which he won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1954.

Related lectures (36)

Fluid Kinematics: Euler/Lagrange

Covers fluid kinematics, Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions, total derivative, rotation, vorticity, and Laplacian in fluid dynamics.

Fundamental Solutions of Laplace Equation

Explores fundamental solutions of the Laplace equation and their physical interpretation.

Logistic Regression: Model Interpretation and Comparison

Explores logistic regression model interpretation, parameter estimation, and model comparison using likelihood ratio tests.

Barycenters: Theory

Covers the theory of barycenters, exploring their physical interpretation and localization.

Spectral Gap in Markov Chains