Mediaspace scheduled maintenance: Aug 25, 2026 07:00 - 12:00 AM. During this time, videos will be temporarily unavailable. Check status updates.

Lecture

Democratic Decision Making: Liquid Democracy

In course

CS-234: Technologies for democratic society

This course will offer students a broad but hands-on introduction to technologies of human self-organization. ...

Description

This lecture delves into the concept of liquid democracy, exploring the tension between direct democracy and representative democracy. The instructor discusses the practicalities and challenges of implementing liquid democracy, such as transitive delegation, accountability, and the risk of accidental concentration of power. Through examples from the German Pirate Party's use of liquid feedback software, the lecture highlights the complexities and potential benefits of liquid democracy in enhancing voter participation and decision-making processes.

This video is available exclusively on Mediaspace for a restricted audience. Please log in to MediaSpace to access it if you have the necessary permissions.

Watch on Mediaspace

Instructors (2)

Verónica del Carmen Estrada Galiñanes

Bryan Alexander Ford

Official source

Related concepts (21)

Participatory democracy

Participatory democracy, participant democracy or participative democracy is a form of government in which citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives, rather than through elected representatives. Elements of direct and representative democracy are combined in this model. Participatory democracy is a type of democracy, which is itself a form of government. The term "democracy" is derived from the Greek expression δημοκρατία (dēmokratia) (δῆμος/dēmos: people, Κράτος/kratos: rule).

Direct democracy

Direct democracy or pure democracy is a form of democracy in which the electorate decides on policy initiatives without elected representatives as proxies. This differs from the majority of currently established democracies, which are representative democracies. The theory and practice of direct democracy and participation as its common characteristic was the core of work of many theorists, philosophers, politicians, and social critics, among whom the most important are Jean Jacques Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, and G.

E-democracy

E-democracy (a blend of the terms electronic and democracy), also known as digital democracy or Internet democracy, uses information and communication technology (ICT) in political and governance processes. The term is credited to digital activist Steven Clift. By using 21st-century ICT, e-democracy seeks to enhance democracy, including aspects like civic technology and E-government. Proponents argue that by promoting transparency in decision-making processes, e-democracy can empower all citizens to observe and understand the proceedings.

Liquid democracy

Liquid democracy is a form of delegative democracy, whereby an electorate engages in collective decision-making through direct participation and dynamic representation. This democratic system utilizes elements of both direct and representative democracy. Voters in a liquid democracy have the right to vote directly on all policy issues à la direct democracy; voters also have the option to delegate their votes to someone who will vote on their behalf à la representative democracy.

Deliberative democracy

Deliberative democracy or discursive democracy is a form of democracy in which deliberation is central to decision-making. Deliberative democracy seeks quality over quantity by limiting decision-makers to a smaller but more representative sample of the population that is given the time and resources to focus on one issue. It often adopts elements of both consensus decision-making and majority rule. Deliberative democracy differs from traditional democratic theory in that authentic deliberation, not mere voting, is the primary source of legitimacy for the law.

Related lectures (31)

Decision-Making Process in Swiss Politics

Explores the decision-making process in Swiss politics, emphasizing slow and incremental changes and the central role of interest groups.

Swiss Political Landscape: Parties and Decision-Making

Explores Swiss political parties, decision-making, interest groups, and 'Concordance Democracy', highlighting the paradox of direct democracy.

E-Voting: Election Phases and Security Measures

Discusses election phases, ballot security, privacy, and transparency in e-voting.

Urban Digital History: Lausanne Time Machine

Emphasizes the importance of incompatibilities to prevent conflicts of interest and maintain democracy, advocating for a constitutional law on the matter.

Contemporary Africa: Image and Themes