Lecture

Causal Inference: Estimands and Ontologies

Graph Chat

Chat with Graph Search

Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.

DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.

Description

This lecture by Mats J. Stensrud from EPFL delves into the fundamental concepts of causal inference, focusing on the importance of committing to an ontology for drawing causal inferences. Stensrud discusses the translation of research questions into formal causal estimands, the conditions for identifying causal estimands, and the estimation of causal effects from data. The lecture explores the significance of statistical and causal ontologies in defining parameters and objects, emphasizing the challenges in selecting appropriate estimands. Stensrud also addresses the implications of deterministic and stochastic counterfactual ontologies in causal inference, highlighting the need for careful consideration in observational and randomized experiments.

Official source

Related concepts (32)

Causal inference

Causal inference is the process of determining the independent, actual effect of a particular phenomenon that is a component of a larger system. The main difference between causal inference and inference of association is that causal inference analyzes the response of an effect variable when a cause of the effect variable is changed. The science of why things occur is called etiology, and can be described using the language of scientific causal notation. Causal inference is said to provide the evidence of causality theorized by causal reasoning.

Causal model

In the philosophy of science, a causal model (or structural causal model) is a conceptual model that describes the causal mechanisms of a system. Several types of causal notation may be used in the development of a causal model. Causal models can improve study designs by providing clear rules for deciding which independent variables need to be included/controlled for. They can allow some questions to be answered from existing observational data without the need for an interventional study such as a randomized controlled trial.

Rubin causal model

The Rubin causal model (RCM), also known as the Neyman–Rubin causal model, is an approach to the statistical analysis of cause and effect based on the framework of potential outcomes, named after Donald Rubin. The name "Rubin causal model" was first coined by Paul W. Holland. The potential outcomes framework was first proposed by Jerzy Neyman in his 1923 Master's thesis, though he discussed it only in the context of completely randomized experiments.

Randomized experiment

In science, randomized experiments are the experiments that allow the greatest reliability and validity of statistical estimates of treatment effects. Randomization-based inference is especially important in experimental design and in survey sampling. In the statistical theory of design of experiments, randomization involves randomly allocating the experimental units across the treatment groups. For example, if an experiment compares a new drug against a standard drug, then the patients should be allocated to either the new drug or to the standard drug control using randomization.

Design of experiments

The design of experiments (DOE or DOX), also known as experiment design or experimental design, is the design of any task that aims to describe and explain the variation of information under conditions that are hypothesized to reflect the variation. The term is generally associated with experiments in which the design introduces conditions that directly affect the variation, but may also refer to the design of quasi-experiments, in which natural conditions that influence the variation are selected for observation.

Related lectures (38)

Causal Analysis of Observational Data

Covers causal analysis of observational data, pitfalls, tools for valid conclusions, and addressing confounding variables.

Allen Human Brain Atlas: Basic Search and Visualization Functions

Offers a tutorial on the Allen Human Brain Atlas for searching and visualizing gene expression data.

Observational Studies: Pitfalls and Valid Conclusions

Highlights the pitfalls of observational studies and the importance of randomized experiments.

Describing Data: Statistics & Uncertainty

Introduces descriptive statistics, uncertainty quantification, and variable relationships, emphasizing the importance of statistical interpretation and critical analysis.

Observational Studies: Pitfalls and Solutions