Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
In mathematics, particularly homological algebra, an exact functor is a functor that preserves short exact sequences. Exact functors are convenient for algebraic calculations because they can be directly applied to presentations of objects. Much of the work in homological algebra is designed to cope with functors that fail to be exact, but in ways that can still be controlled. Let P and Q be abelian categories, and let F: P→Q be a covariant additive functor (so that, in particular, F(0) = 0). We say that F is an exact functor if whenever is a short exact sequence in P then is a short exact sequence in Q. (The maps are often omitted and implied, and one says: "if 0→A→B→C→0 is exact, then 0→F(A)→F(B)→F(C)→0 is also exact".) Further, we say that F is left-exact if whenever 0→A→B→C→0 is exact then 0→F(A)→F(B)→F(C) is exact; right-exact if whenever 0→A→B→C→0 is exact then F(A)→F(B)→F(C)→0 is exact; half-exact if whenever 0→A→B→C→0 is exact then F(A)→F(B)→F(C) is exact. This is distinct from the notion of a topological half-exact functor. If G is a contravariant additive functor from P to Q, we similarly define G to be exact if whenever 0→A→B→C→0 is exact then 0→G(C)→G(B)→G(A)→0 is exact; left-exact if whenever 0→A→B→C→0 is exact then 0→G(C)→G(B)→G(A) is exact; right-exact if whenever 0→A→B→C→0 is exact then G(C)→G(B)→G(A)→0 is exact; half-exact if whenever 0→A→B→C→0 is exact then G(C)→G(B)→G(A) is exact. It is not always necessary to start with an entire short exact sequence 0→A→B→C→0 to have some exactness preserved. The following definitions are equivalent to the ones given above: F is exact if and only if A→B→C exact implies F(A)→F(B)→F(C) exact; F is left-exact if and only if 0→A→B→C exact implies 0→F(A)→F(B)→F(C) exact (i.e. if "F turns kernels into kernels"); F is right-exact if and only if A→B→C→0 exact implies F(A)→F(B)→F(C)→0 exact (i.e. if "F turns cokernels into cokernels"); G is left-exact if and only if A→B→C→0 exact implies 0→G(C)→G(B)→G(A) exact (i.e.
[2]Paolo Prandoni, [3]LCAV, EPFL
In this notebook we will explore various ways to implement a system
that changes the voice of a speaker. Typical applications for these
techniques, strictly sorted by plausibility, include international spy
missions and prank telephone calls, and devices such as the one
displayed here can be easily bought on the web... or in a novelty shop.
No description has been provided for t